Incentives dominate selection – Chamber-changing legislators are driven by electoral rules and voter preferences
نویسندگان
چکیده
The role of electoral incentives vs. selection is ideally analyzed in a setting where individual legislators are selected to decide on policies under different rules and voter preferences can be precisely measured. This the first paper look at such situation. institutional Switzerland allows us observe behavior who change from proportionally-elected chamber majority-elected parliament with their electorate being same both chambers. Voter revealed referenda. We identify behavioral changes chamber-changers comparison other due respective along three dimensions, all measured level legislators: representation for policies, party loyalty, interest group affiliations. evidence suggests that explain response towards an extent there remains no relevant selection. After having changed chamber, cater more intensely majority (including median voter), become less loyal adapt lobby affiliations district-oriented interests.
منابع مشابه
Voter Preferences, Polarization, and Electoral Policies
A probabilistic voting model with voter utility functions that are not necessarily concave is examined. When voters are polarized, there is a convexity threshold of their utility function below which policy convergence is a unique equilibrium, and above which policy divergence is a unique equilibrium. Divergent equilibrium is more likely when voters become more polarized. Social welfare is maxi...
متن کاملDecentralization and electoral accountability: Incentives, separation and voter welfare
Article history: Received 26 June 2008 Received in revised form 20 January 2009 Accepted 23 January 2009 Available online 4 February 2009 This paper provides a systematic analysis of fiscal decentralization on the quality of government by studying jointly its effects on electoral discipline and selection, in a settingwhere, realistically, voters only have limited information aboutfiscal policy ...
متن کاملEndogenous Majority Rules with Changing Preferences
This paper provides a new explanation why several US states have implemented supermajority requirements for tax increases.We model a dynamic and stochastic OLG economy where individual preferences depend on age and change over time in a systematic way. In this setting, we show that the first population of voters will choose a supermajority rule in order to influence the outcomes of future elect...
متن کاملVoter Turnout and Preferences Aggregation∗
This paper studies how voter turnout affects the extent to which voter preferences are aggregated in elections. Given that voting is costly, election outcomes disproportionately aggregate the preferences of voters with low voting cost. We show that the correlation structure among preferences, costs, and perception of voting effi cacy can be identified, and explore how the correlation affects pr...
متن کاملThe Turnout Paradox: Why Changing Electoral Experiences Trump Changing Social Characteristics in Driving Voter Turnout in Advanced Democracies
This paper challenges the dominant paradigm of turnout studies by proposing that turnout variations occur because elections differ, not because countries differ; and certainly not because people differ. Indeed, we take the radical position that what matters if we want to understand overtime and cross-national turnout variations is differences in the ways in which citizens are affected by the el...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['0167-2681', '1879-1751']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2021.10.023